I’ve tried a few online dating services over the years, but never got too serious about them. The dates that I did go on never led to a second one. The matches were poor and if I had to go by the flattering photos alone I’d have never recognized the woman in a crowd. Of course, that doesn’t stop all the services from sending me recruitment spam. I doubt that I’m part of their target demographic. I am not interested in the “Hot 23 year old in YOUR AREA!” or “Russian beauty looking for love!”
Regardless, I find something oddly appealing about creating profiles. Maybe it strokes my ego and iconoclastic nature to see that few people share my array of interests. Maybe it’s a way to look like my ideal self. Most of these services allow you to check off negative properties in your match preferences but I’ve yet to see any that allow you to describe yourself as lazy, drug addict, egotistical, reclusive, pedantic, sloppy, fat, depressive, or psychotic – not that I’m any of these things, mind you.
These dating profiles usually languish after an initial rush, just like my Facebook, MySpace, Yahoo, Google, and drive-by forum profiles. I can’t even remember many of them.
It was a slow day and I didn’t feel like pursuing my latest essay (a history of drug advertising.) The eHarmony dating service has been pestering me of late to take their FREE personality analysis. In the past I’ve found these things to be about 50% accurate or so general that they’d fit most anybody, but I was bored. I waded through the several pages of multiple choice questions. As expected, some of it was accurate, some way off. Undoubtedly, my aversion to pigeon-holing and my general ambiguity has something to do with this. I tend to see things from several angles which makes generalization difficult.
In addition to the personality analysis eHarmony has an extensive checklist of profile descriptors. In most cases there is an “other” field for free-form text entry.
The matches they recommend don’t always “match.” They use something called “Flexible Matching” which will ignore any preferences marked less than “very important”. The result is quantity over quality. As they explain it, you should look beyond your expectations. Good advice, but no matter what they say I’m not going to begin a relationship with someone on the other side of the country or who thinks that a good weekend is seeing the wilderness from the window of an SUV.
eHarmony utilizes something called “Guided Communications”. When a match is made, both parties are informed. One party initiates communication by sending a list of five questions chosen from a set. The other party answers then sends their own five questions. The next step involves the two of you exchanging “Must Haves” and “Can’t Stands”, checklists of qualities you look for in another person. Another round of questions ensues, again chosen from a pre-packaged list, but this time they are essay-type rather than multiple choice. Finally, after reading an essay by the founder of eHarmony, you are allowed open communication.
Managing my account has started to feel like a job. Every day I get a half-dozen matches. As soon as I clear those, another half-dozen shows up. Currently there are thirty of them. eHarmony keeps prodding me to participate, often by using one of their extra, additional-fee services. My inbox is filled with emails from them.
I gotta go. Debbie from Dallas has some questions for me.